2025/freebsd-pkgbase/20250929.freebsd-pkgbase
Messages: 12, sorted by subject
|
Last update: Mon Sep 29 0:07:11 2025
|
|
home | up | archive sorted by: subject | author | date | reverse date
1. Sep 22 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 289368] If $BASEDIR is undefined, then refusal to run freebsd-update is ineffective on a pkgbase system 2. Sep 26 Mark Millard https://pkg.freebsd.org/FreeBSD:15:amd64/base_latest/ : why is FreeBSD-utilities-dbg hours older than FreeBSD-utilities ? 3. Sep 26 Mark Millard Re: https://pkg.freebsd.org/FreeBSD:15:amd64/base_latest/ : why is FreeBSD-utilities-dbg hours older than FreeBSD-utilities ? [ALPHA4 update i 4. Sep 27 Graham Perrin Re: https://pkg.freebsd.org/FreeBSD:15:amd64/base_latest/ : why is FreeBSD-utilities-dbg hours older than FreeBSD-utilities ? [ALPHA4 update i 5. Sep 27 Mark Millard Re: https://pkg.freebsd.org/FreeBSD:15:amd64/base_latest/ : why is FreeBSD-utilities-dbg hours older than FreeBSD-utilities ? [ALPHA4 update i 6. Sep 24 Graham Perrin Re: Is the base set of packages everything, or not? 7. Sep 27 Mark Millard Why are /usr/lib/pam*.so in FreeBSD-runtime instead of FreeBSD-runtime-dev ? 8. Sep 27 Mark Millard Re: Why are /usr/lib/pam*.so in FreeBSD-runtime instead of FreeBSD-runtime-dev ? 9. Sep 22 Mark Millard Why is https://pkg.freebsd.org/FreeBSD:15:i386/base_latest/ existing and getting 15.0-ALPHA* updates? 10. Sep 22 Colin Percival Re: Why is https://pkg.freebsd.org/FreeBSD:15:i386/base_latest/ existing and getting 15.0-ALPHA* updates? 11. Sep 22 Mark Millard Re: Why is https://pkg.freebsd.org/FreeBSD:15:i386/base_latest/ existing and getting 15.0-ALPHA* updates? 12. Sep 23 Philip Paeps Re: Why is https://pkg.freebsd.org/FreeBSD:15:i386/base_latest/ existing and getting 15.0-ALPHA* updates?
home | up | archive sorted by: subject | author | date | reverse date