Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)


2025/freebsd-ports/20250512.freebsd-ports

Messages: 52, sorted by subject
Last page update: Sat Jan 3 13:13:50 UTC 2026

home | up | archive | sorted by: subject - author - date - reverse date
  1. May  7 Mark Millard               beefy8 and beefy7 are suddenly both doing parallel builds of 142amd64-default with build names like 2025-05-07_07h40m51s ?
  2. May  7 Philip Paeps                Re: beefy8 and beefy7 are suddenly both doing parallel builds of 142amd64-default with build names like 2025-05-07_07h40m51s ?
  3. May  8 Dan Mahoney (Ports)        Help me understand "fakeroot"
  4. May  9 Dag-Erling Smørgrav         Re: Help me understand "fakeroot"
  5. May  9 Tomoaki AOKI                Re: Help me understand "fakeroot"
  6. May  9 Mathieu Arnold              Re: Help me understand "fakeroot"
  7. May  9 Dan Mahoney (Ports)         Re: Help me understand "fakeroot"
  8. May 10 Mathieu Arnold              Re: Help me understand "fakeroot"
  9. May  7 Per olof Ljungmark         HP gen10 controllers
 10. May  7 John W                     Is using ports directly (via 'make', etc) a second-class citizen?
 11. May  8 Space Cadet                 Re: Is using ports directly (via 'make', etc) a second-class citizen?
 12. May  8 Chris                       Re: Is using ports directly (via 'make', etc) a second-class citizen?
 13. May  8 Volodymyr Kostyrko          Re: Is using ports directly (via 'make', etc) a second-class citizen?
 14. May  8 Chris                       Re: Is using ports directly (via 'make', etc) a second-class citizen?
 15. May  8 Moin Rahman                 Re: Is using ports directly (via 'make', etc) a second-class citizen?
 16. May  8 Helge Oldach                Re: Is using ports directly (via 'make', etc) a second-class citizen?
 17. May  8 Moin Rahman                 Re: Is using ports directly (via 'make', etc) a second-class citizen?
 18. May  8 Bojan Petrovic              Re: Is using ports directly (via 'make', etc) a second-class citizen?
 19. May  8 Thierry Thomas              Re: Is using ports directly (via 'make', etc) a second-class citizen?
 20. May  8 Helge Oldach                Re: Is using ports directly (via 'make', etc) a second-class citizen?

 21. May  8 Kurt Jaeger                 Re: Is using ports directly (via 'make', etc) a second-class citizen?
 22. May  8 Moin Rahman                 Re: Is using ports directly (via 'make', etc) a second-class citizen?
 23. May  8 Moin Rahman                 Re: Is using ports directly (via 'make', etc) a second-class citizen?
 24. May  8 Kurt Jaeger                 Re: Is using ports directly (via 'make', etc) a second-class citizen?
 25. May  8 Lorenzo Salvadore           Re: Is using ports directly (via 'make', etc) a second-class citizen?
 26. May  8 Helge Oldach                Re: Is using ports directly (via 'make', etc) a second-class citizen?
 27. May  8 Gleb Popov                  Re: Is using ports directly (via 'make', etc) a second-class citizen?
 28. May  8 Marek Zarychta              Re: Is using ports directly (via 'make', etc) a second-class citizen?
 29. May  8 Chris                       Re: Is using ports directly (via 'make', etc) a second-class citizen?
 30. May  8 Chris                       Re: Is using ports directly (via 'make', etc) a second-class citizen?
 31. May  8 freebsd@oldach.net          Re: Is using ports directly (via 'make', etc) a second-class citizen?
 32. May  8 Piotr Smyrak                Re: Is using ports directly (via 'make', etc) a second-class citizen?
 33. May  9 Chris                       Re: Is using ports directly (via 'make', etc) a second-class citizen?
 34. May  9 Helge Oldach                Re: Is using ports directly (via 'make', etc) a second-class citizen?
 35. May  9 Mark Millard               Re: Is using ports directly (via 'make', etc) a second-class citizen? [finding what pkg.freebsd.org/FreeBSD:*:*/ exist]
 36. May  9 Mark Millard               RE: Is using ports directly (via 'make', etc) a second-class citizen? [The Makefile does work correctly via use of poudriere(-devel)]
 37. May  9 Mark Millard               Re: Is using ports directly (via 'make', etc) a second-class citizen? [tier 2 package availabity
 38. May  9 Piotr Smyrak                Re: Is using ports directly (via 'make', etc) a second-class citizen? [tier 2 package availabity
 39. May  5 Mark Millard               Re: lang/gcc15 fails to build on aarch64 : error: 'ElfW' redefined [-Werror]
 40. May  9 Helge Oldach               Mis-attributed emails (was: Re: Is using ports directly (via 'make', etc) a second-class citizen?)

 41. May 11 dave@jetcafe.org            Re: Mis-attributed emails (was: Re: Is using ports directly (via 'make', etc) a second-class citizen?)
 42. May  5 portscout@FreeBSD.org      Unmaintained FreeBSD ports which are out of date
 43. May  6 portscout@FreeBSD.org       Unmaintained FreeBSD ports which are out of date
 44. May  7 portscout@FreeBSD.org       Unmaintained FreeBSD ports which are out of date
 45. May  8 portscout@FreeBSD.org       Unmaintained FreeBSD ports which are out of date
 46. May  9 portscout@FreeBSD.org       Unmaintained FreeBSD ports which are out of date
 47. May 10 portscout@FreeBSD.org       Unmaintained FreeBSD ports which are out of date
 48. May 11 portscout@FreeBSD.org       Unmaintained FreeBSD ports which are out of date
 49. May 11 Andrea Venturoli           wazuh-keystore: "No such file or directory"
 50. May 11 acm@freebsd.org             Re: wazuh-keystore: "No such file or directory"
 51. May  5 Jonathan Chen              www/chromium build failing?
 52. May  5 David Wolfskill             Re: www/chromium build failing?

home | up | archive | sorted by: subject - author - date - reverse date