Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 19 Apr 1999 17:46:04 +0200
From:      Martin Cracauer <cracauer@cons.org>
To:        "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@zippy.cdrom.com>
Cc:        advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: http://www.freebsd.org/features.html
Message-ID:  <19990419174604.A14787@cons.org>
In-Reply-To: <14692.924172106@zippy.cdrom.com>; from Jordan K. Hubbard on Thu, Apr 15, 1999 at 03:28:26AM -0700
References:  <14692.924172106@zippy.cdrom.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In <14692.924172106@zippy.cdrom.com>, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: 
> Whatever happened to the plans to update this - Don?

Here's my take, unspellchecked etc for now. Once again I invite you to
give me feedback on http://www3.cons.org/cracauer/freebsd.html,
sepcially on parts you may find suitable for the official FreeBSD
Website. 


   FreeBSD offers you an OpenSource operating system that focuses on
   stability, scalability, performance and upgradability.
   
   The FreeBSD development team reaches these goals by providing a
   complete operating system with everything you need for a running
   system. From one source, getting rid of a large number of possible
   incompatibilities, and freeing the user from much of the usual
   headaches when upgrading the system.
   
   FreeBSD is based on the well-acknowledged BSD operating system,
   developed at the University of California, Berkeley. BSD has been the
   base the base for many of the most influential UNIX derivates (i.e.
   SunOS and Ultrix). The TCP/IP suite - today the most important network
   protocol in the world - was developed as part of the BSD system. Many
   IP stacks in commercial OSes are still based on the BSD
   implementation.
   
   FreeBSD takes the final form of BSD - 4.4lite2 - and combines it with
   the great experience of its developers (among them are many
   well-regarded experts for virtual memory, networking, storage
   subsystems and third-party software integration) and the overwhelming
   testing and educated-feedback [I am such a LIAR!!!] providing manpower
   of an OpenSource project to take BSD to new limits.
   
   While the basic BSD system was already regarded one of the best
   operating systems for many purposes, FreeBSD systematically removes
   limitations that made BSD less that ideal for other areas.
     * The TCP/IP implementation that made BSD famous is still the base
       of FreeBSD, with suitable changes to support the large new
       Internet servers and new services noone dreamed of when the
       protocol has been developed.
     * The performance of FreeBSD's virtual memory system is generally
       regarded as one of the best. Machines with too few memory for
       their tasks - be it a heavily loaded big Internet server with
       unexpected access peaks or a laptop which just doesn't take as
       much memory as the user needs - will speed up dramatically under
       FreeBSD.
       The improved VM system also offers other advantages. Such as an
       integrated VM and filesystem cache, which avoids the difficulties
       many users experience when mixing applications that use different
       memory interfaces on other platforms. Of course, the amount of
       memory used for cache is tuned dynamically.
       An important point about the FreeBSD VM system is that it isn't
       rewritten from scratch. What has been done here is to tune the
       4.4BSD VM system according to the measurements taken from existing
       systems under real workload.
     * FreeBSD offers environments to execute binary programs from other
       operating system, among them Linux, SCO UNIX, Solaris/x86, NetBSD
       and BSDI.
       These don't really count as "emulations" in the classical sense.
       The layers to support these OSes are very lightweight, and the
       libraries used to run these binaries are the native ones (of
       course, this implies that you need a license of these OSes to run
       dynamically linked binaries). As a result, the speed of non-native
       binaries nearly equals those of native FreeBSD binaries (and may
       be better than under the native OS when one of FreeBSD's
       performance hotspots are used by the application) and the list of
       binaries running without problems is very complete. A list of
       supported applications is here . This list goes as far as
       supporting X servers of other OSes and support for Linux
       applications that need 3dfx/Voodoo cards.
       An often overlooked advantage of running other OSes in FreeBSD
       emulation is that you can arrange the execution environment
       (configuration, shared libraries etc.) to be optimal for your
       application. This setup only affect the emulation environment, you
       cannot damage the basic operating system if you make a mistake as
       you could when both the application and the base system share an
       environment.
       Support for not so UNIX-like operating systems is generally a more
       problematic kind of emulation, but the MS-Windows emulator WINE -
       which made grat progress in the last time - runs on FreeBSD as
       well as on other UNIX derivates, as do several DOS emulators with
       specific strengths and weaknesses.
     * Another great strenth of FreeBSD is it's third-party-software
       integration system, called ports. The ports system of FreeBSD
       doesn't only focus on handling, installing and removing already
       compiled applications. The ports system also offers serious
       support for controlled upgrading and user-verified installation. A
       user who needs complete control about which applications are
       installed in what way will find a very transparent scheme that
       makes his reviewing and customizing task easy. The ports system
       isn't the third-party software in modified form. A port is
       basically a dense specification of the necessary steps to install
       a program on FreeBSD, from downloading, application of
       easy-to-verify FreeBSD-specific changes, compiling and installing,
       with necessary hooks to remove it later or to distribute it in
       compiled (binary) form. The ports system also takes care to keep
       configuration files of deinstalled ports so that a new install may
       reuse those later.
       The user can verify the actions a port installation will take
       within seconds and the ports system allows him to keep his own
       customizations, even those that require source changes.
     * FreeBSD also offers the so far best solution for the "metadata
       update problem". This problem is basically like this: While all
       modern operating systems write-cache the data you write to files
       and thus you are in risk to loose the contents of these files in
       the case of a system crash, these is also "metadata". "Metadata"
       is those data that isn't part of you files, but data that
       describes the layout of your partition and where you files live:
       how they are named, how old they are and which disk blocks they
       allocate. Write-caching this data is much more dangerous than
       doing so for normal data (the data *inside* your files), since a
       crash may cause you to loose data in files you did not tough
       during you work, or to loose the whole partition with all its
       files.
       Therefore, most operating systems chose to write out "metadata"
       synchronously, without a write cache. But this is slow and can
       become a major annoyance with tasks that require many file
       creation/deleting/renaming operations, like unpacking compressed
       file archives.
       FreeBSD's "softupdates" offer a solution that is fast *and* safe.
       The trick is to keep memory of all "metadata" operations, sort
       them and then write them to disk in an order that ensures that you
       will never loose data you didn't write just before. It's no black
       art, the cost is that this scheme took a major effort to develop.
       Kirk McKusick [FIXME: link] implemented such a scheme and it is
       available free of charge under certain circumstances. Thankfully,
       FreeBSD's license fits these circumstances, and members of the
       FreeBSD development team wrote the necessary pieces to use
       softupdates in FreeBSD, so most FreeBSD users will be able to use
       softwares with just a recompile of the kernel.
     * CAM [FIMXE fill this]
     * bootloader [FIMXE fill this]


-- 
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
Martin Cracauer <cracauer@cons.org> http://www.cons.org/cracauer/
  Tel.: (private) +4940 5221829 Fax.: (private) +4940 5228536


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990419174604.A14787>