Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2004 12:58:07 -0400 From: Garance A Drosihn <drosih@rpi.edu> To: Scott Long <scottl@freebsd.org> Cc: Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@xcllnt.net> Subject: Re: HEADS UP! KSE needs more attention Message-ID: <p06020443bcea4e890909@[128.113.24.47]> In-Reply-To: <40C48BA8.6090005@freebsd.org> References: <40C36D31.4010003@freebsd.org> <20040606193510.GA95886@dhcp50.pn.xcllnt.net> <40C37F3C.1050602@freebsd.org> <20040606211249.GC96607@dhcp50.pn.xcllnt.net> <40C390C4.1000609@freebsd.org> <p06020439bce9548970a4@[128.113.24.47]> <40C48BA8.6090005@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 9:37 AM -0600 6/7/04, Scott Long wrote: >Garance A Drosihn wrote: >> >>I think you have to officially demote it, with emphasis on the >>point that "demotion is not a terminal condition". Then, if some >>developer(s) show up and implement all the missing pieces, we >>can happily announce it back in tier 1. >> >>But for now, say that it *IS* demoted. Not that you're advocating >>that we think about maybe demoting it in the future unless someone >>offers to start looking into the missing pieces. > >One thing to note is that whatever platforms get dropped from tier-1 >status will have a high probablility of not getting updated with the >upcoming binutils/gcc/gdb update that is coming. If that is the case, then you can not say "demotion is not a terminal condition". That sounds pretty terminal to me. -- Garance Alistair Drosehn = gad@gilead.netel.rpi.edu Senior Systems Programmer or gad@freebsd.org Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute or drosih@rpi.edu
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?p06020443bcea4e890909>