Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 30 Jan 2001 19:18:19 -0800
From:      Gregory Neil Shapiro <gshapiro@FreeBSD.ORG>
To:        Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net>
Cc:        Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>, stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: BIND 8.2.3 upgrade available
Message-ID:  <14967.33787.860615.192886@horsey.gshapiro.net>
In-Reply-To: <20010129164711.K26076@fw.wintelcom.net>
References:  <20010129143300.A38419@xor.obsecurity.org> <20010129153144.H26076@fw.wintelcom.net> <14966.3324.107528.104198@horsey.gshapiro.net> <20010129164711.K26076@fw.wintelcom.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>>>>> "bright" == Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net> writes:

bright> * Gregory Neil Shapiro <gshapiro@FreeBSD.ORG> [010129 16:38] wrote:
bright> Is there any chance that the bind and sendmail people could backport
bright> -DNO_SENDMAIL and -DNO_NAMED to 3.x (and maybe 2.x)?
>> 
>> What does the BIND bug have to do with sendmail?

bright> It was related in that, the sendmail and bind shipped with 2.2.x
bright> and 3.x is pretty bad, and upgrades shouldn't get clobbered by make
bright> world in case there's a system change.

bright> It's nice to be able to clobber the /usr instead of installing into
bright> /usr/local for older versions of FreeBSD.

Judging by:

http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/usr.sbin/Makefile?rev=RELENG_3&content-type=text/x-cvsweb-markup

3.X already has NO_SENDMAIL and NO_BIND.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?14967.33787.860615.192886>