Date: Fri, 03 May 1996 08:23:54 -0500 From: Dave Glowacki <dglo@SSEC.WISC.EDU> To: Jim Dennis <jimd@mistery.mcafee.com> Cc: drbeck@onramp.net (David R. Beck), questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Linux vs. FreeBSD Message-ID: <199605031323.IAA27333@tick.ssec.wisc.edu> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 02 May 1996 13:39:39 PDT." <199605022039.NAA02271@mistery.mcafee.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> I suspect that this group is tired of hearing the "Linux vs. FreeBSD" > debate (and my answer in particular). > > Here's the summary of my opinion: > If you want to run a server (ftp, mail, web) and you want > better security, closer adherence to BSD conventions and > traditions (especially handy when you want an experienced > consultant to help with configuration, upgrades or > troubleshooting) go with FreeBSD. I'd change that "and" in the first line to an "or" and add something like: If you want a system where development of the kernel and system applications are closely connected, and where the developers of the kernel and system apps are involved in the release process, go with FreeBSD.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199605031323.IAA27333>