Date: Thu, 15 Jul 1999 12:02:30 -0700 From: "David Schwartz" <davids@webmaster.com> To: "Tani Hosokawa" <unknown@riverstyx.net> Cc: <lh@aus.org>, <chat@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: RE: Known MMAP() race conditions ... ? Message-ID: <000101becef4$966499b0$021d85d1@youwant.to> In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.10.9907151156560.10288-100000@avarice.riverstyx.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > If Apache went to a model as bad as 'one thread per > request', you'd do > > better to advise switching to another web server instead. > > "went to"? Right now it's a one *process* per request. Have you ever run > Apache? Sure. I run it on many machines, including several that are very heavily loaded. It's one-process-per-request model is atrocious. If they're going to go to the trouble to fix it, they should actually fix it. Going to one-thread-per-request is just silly. If you're going to make a threaded program, you should do it right. A half-assed threaded program may even be worse than a well-designed one-process-per-request program. DS To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?000101becef4$966499b0$021d85d1>