Date: Wed, 22 May 2019 17:59:16 +0300 From: Daniel Braniss <danny@cs.huji.ac.il> To: Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> Cc: Enji Cooper <yaneurabeya@gmail.com>, hackers@freebsd.org, "Andrey V. Elsukov" <bu7cher@yandex.ru> Subject: Re: ERR#78 'function not implemented' Message-ID: <053B6218-7AEA-4845-B6EA-030E1F9C6FEB@cs.huji.ac.il> In-Reply-To: <20190522134841.GZ2748@kib.kiev.ua> References: <6B0A65C2-5F53-47B3-8159-0AEA3E0C37C4@cs.huji.ac.il> <87ede120-b533-302d-6ffb-82fd735dce21@yandex.ru> <7C0C64B8-B2A4-4CE8-9A1A-9394A9E1550A@cs.huji.ac.il> <1419BF6D-9BF3-454B-A9BB-E7CB50D4B540@gmail.com> <20190522134841.GZ2748@kib.kiev.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On 22 May 2019, at 16:48, Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> = wrote: >=20 > On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 06:16:03AM -0700, Enji Cooper wrote: >>=20 >>> On May 22, 2019, at 05:57, Daniel Braniss <danny@cs.huji.ac.il> = wrote: >>>=20 >>>> On 22 May 2019, at 11:38, Andrey V. Elsukov <bu7cher@yandex.ru> = wrote: >>>>=20 >>>> On 21.05.2019 19:03, Daniel Braniss wrote: >>>>> Hi, >>>>> Im using a freebsd-stable-11.1-STABLE to cross compile for arm, I = have been doing it for some time >>>>> without any issues, but today I decided to try out release.sh and = it failes. >>>>> I have run the =E2=80=98bad=E2=80=99 command: >>>>=20 >>>>> -- UNKNOWN FreeBSD ELF64 SYSCALL 568 -- >>>>> #568() ERR#78 'Function = not implemented' >>>>> SIGNAL 12 (SIGSYS) code=3DSI_KERNEL >>>>> process killed, signal =3D 12 (core dumped) >>>>=20 >>>> Hi, >>>>=20 >>>> Your kernel is too old to be able run this binary. Syscall 568 is >>>> funlinkat(2), it was introduced in r345982. >>>>=20 >>>> https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=3Drevision&revision=3D345982 >>>>=20 >>> hi, >>> thanks, so that raises a new question: >>> Q: to use release.sh one needs to be running the latest current? >>=20 >> In theory, liblegacy and ITOOLS should be taking care of some of = this. A binary is being run from the install which should be run from = the system. >>=20 > liblegacy only relevant when your target is the old host system. It = cannot > help with running binary built on newer system. >=20 >> That being said, you should be running a more recent release of 11.x = or stable/11. > No. >=20 > You cannot run 12 binaries on 11 at all (practically any binary would = fail), > and you cannot run some HEAD binaries on 12. at the moment, my workaround is to change the mounts (so far in 2 = places) to not do a chroot, thus using the system=E2=80=99s mount. (I still have not succeeded in crating an sd image, it just takes too = long :-) Q: why shouldn=E2=80=99t this be the default? and now I run away and hide cheers, danny
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?053B6218-7AEA-4845-B6EA-030E1F9C6FEB>