Date: 28 Jan 2003 11:53:52 +1030 From: "Daniel O'Connor" <doconnor@gsoft.com.au> To: James Pole <james.pole@paradise.net.nz> Cc: Paul Mather <paul@gromit.dlib.vt.edu>, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Problem with NVIDIA kernel driver with recent kernel Message-ID: <1043717032.85849.10.camel@chowder.gsoft.com.au> In-Reply-To: <1043716452.96617.3.camel@localhost> References: <20030127204647.GA373@gromit.dlib.vt.edu> <00b501c2c647$eeb5ba60$0e0c32d4@niked> <20030127230130.GA3246@gromit.dlib.vt.edu> <1043714433.96161.14.camel@localhost> <1043715322.85849.6.camel@chowder.gsoft.com.au> <1043716452.96617.3.camel@localhost>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 2003-01-28 at 11:44, James Pole wrote: > > ... and it's slower for 2D as well. > > How can you tell the difference in 2D performance between 'nv' and > NVIDIA's 'nvidia' driver? The difference is very very small -- unless > you can back up your claims with 2D benchmarks which proves that > NVIDIA's driver is indeed better at 2D... I have found 24 bit displays are snappier with the nvidia driver - I don't have a benchmark to back it up though. I might run one if I can be bothered tonight. Another advantage of the nvidia driver is that it provides Xv support for non GeForce chipsets. -- Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum GPG Fingerprint - 9A8C 569F 685A D928 5140 AE4B 319B 41F4 5D17 FDD5 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1043717032.85849.10.camel>