Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2004 14:26:57 -0400 From: Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@marcuscom.com> To: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com> Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: When (not) to enter a repo-copy in ports/MOVED Message-ID: <1094149616.740.31.camel@gyros> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.61.0409021258000.99539@acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at> References: <Pine.BSF.4.61.0409021258000.99539@acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-zkY9AhhnolQt7JcZGApt Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 2004-09-02 at 07:01, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > According to > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/committers-guide/port= s.html#Q12.2.3. > adding an entry to ports/MOVED should be done for all repo-copies. >=20 > I just completed a repo-copy of lang/gcc34 to lang/gcc35, where we will=20 > retain both the old and new versions for quite some time. Does this=20 > really require an entry in ports/MOVED as well? No. You only need a MOVED entry if one port is being removed, or if users of one port should move to using another port for the same functionality. Since both ports are going to coexist, you can forgo a MOVED entry. Joe --=20 PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc --=-zkY9AhhnolQt7JcZGApt Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBBN2Xwb2iPiv4Uz4cRAuVBAJ0QPN0y+3KZGitSlwwqP1t89MwxswCffZ7Y Mur0bFTijysMjqsLH6BPqDM= =CS4O -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-zkY9AhhnolQt7JcZGApt--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1094149616.740.31.camel>