Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2005 16:26:08 +0100 From: Robert Slade <bsd@bathnetworks.com> To: aaron.glenn@gmail.com Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: FreeBSD 5.4 sparc64 netboot install? Message-ID: <1126279567.17953.2.camel@lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <18f6019405090823086bdbd800@mail.gmail.com> References: <18f6019405090816202beaf583@mail.gmail.com> <20050908232230.GA48258@xor.obsecurity.org> <18f601940509082248503b2c48@mail.gmail.com> <20050909060034.GA48622@xor.obsecurity.org> <18f6019405090823086bdbd800@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 2005-09-09 at 07:08, Aaron Glenn wrote: > On 9/8/05, Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 10:48:56PM -0700, Aaron Glenn wrote: > > > If you can point me to a resource I've overlooked, please do so. I > > > would greatly appreciate a hit with the cluestick on this one. > > > > You don't need a special bootloader any longer. Just use the standard > > one. > > > > Kris > > Fair enough, but that isn't mentioned or documented anywhere. Posting > to a mailing list is *always* a last resort; and yet I had to because > I could find nothing even remotely up to date on the subject. I've > continued to use FreeBSD for the past five years because of the > documentation. Why isn't the netboot installation method detailed > definitively somewhere? Is it simply because no one has updated the > previous one, or is there another reason? If it were supported, > shouldn't it be listed in the installation notes? > > aaron.glenn Try this: http://www.freebsd.org/releases/5.4R/installation-ia64.html reachable from the home page - > installation notes _ > sparc64 Rob
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1126279567.17953.2.camel>