Date: Tue, 08 Jul 1997 08:11:20 +0200 From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@dk.tfs.com> To: proff@suburbia.net Cc: robert@cyrus.watson.org (Robert Watson), sef@kithrup.com, security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Security Model/Target for FreeBSD or 4.4? Message-ID: <1255.868342280@critter.dk.tfs.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 08 Jul 1997 07:29:23 %2B1000." <19970707212923.12941.qmail@suburbia.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <19970707212923.12941.qmail@suburbia.net>, proff@suburbia.net writes : >PHK (FreeBSD core) decided to zorch the LD_CHROOT patch under the >basis that the efficiency gains could be realised by hardlinking >all your system libraries into the chroot()ed area. The mind boggles. Hmm, let me try to say it my way: PHK (FreeBSD core) decided that considering the rather marginal gain, there is no point in deliberately creating holes in the chroot armour. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | phk@FreeBSD.ORG FreeBSD Core-team. http://www.freebsd.org/~phk | phk@login.dknet.dk Private mailbox. whois: [PHK] | phk@tfs.com TRW Financial Systems, Inc. Power and ignorance is a disgusting cocktail.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1255.868342280>