Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 08:49:30 -0700 From: Sean Bruno <seanbru@yahoo-inc.com> To: Andriy Gapon <avg@freebsd.org> Cc: "freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org" <freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org>, Vitaly Magerya <vmagerya@gmail.com>, Giovanni Trematerra <gianni@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: improve cx_lowest logic Message-ID: <1341935370.4493.4.camel@powernoodle> In-Reply-To: <4FF95F79.30309@FreeBSD.org> References: <4FF95F79.30309@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 2012-07-08 at 03:22 -0700, Andriy Gapon wrote: > I would like to propose the following change for review and testing: > http://people.freebsd.org/~avg/acpi_cpu_cx_lowest.diff Very nice. After a review I went ahead and applied it for testing. All seems to be well on battery and A/C on my T520 so I'm very happy to see this go into the tree. Let me know if you want me to do the man page update for acpi_cpu(4) Sean
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1341935370.4493.4.camel>