Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 22:58:59 -0600 From: Nate Williams <nate@yogotech.com> To: Bill Huey <billh@gnuppy.monkey.org> Cc: Nate Williams <nate@yogotech.com>, freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 1.3.1 patchset 7 not quite ready Message-ID: <15661.4243.151196.206598@emerger.yogotech.com> In-Reply-To: <20020711045652.GA4478@gnuppy.monkey.org> References: <20020710234814.GE2394@gnuppy.monkey.org> <15660.64672.311655.234760@emerger.yogotech.com> <20020711035137.GA4210@gnuppy.monkey.org> <15661.575.854309.132871@emerger.yogotech.com> <20020711044606.GA4375@gnuppy.monkey.org> <15661.3652.734594.522357@emerger.yogotech.com> <20020711045652.GA4478@gnuppy.monkey.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > Julian (the person we get to blame for these bugs) can't determine why > > sometimes it works and other times it doesn't, so I'm suprised you are > > so confident in your ability to differentiate between kernel 'signal' > > bugs and JVM bugs. > > Maybe I'm taking on too much at this time with kernel signals (fix julian's > problems), userspace signals and HotSpot. I am getting wierd pauses and I'm > curious if they're KSE related. If that's the case, then you'll see a > backport effort done by me. > > > Dan *owns* libc_r. If it's done to libc_r, he's the man to commit the > > changes after reviewing them. > > > > If you want the changes backported, then Dan is the man to do it. If > > you want it done sooner, let him know what needs to be done, (providing > > patches, pointers, etc..) > > True, but the review process doesn't excluded the backport effort itself. Right, but the commit of the backported changes needs either Dan's review and (more likely) he'll do the commit himself. Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?15661.4243.151196.206598>