Date: Tue, 05 Jan 1999 23:13:35 +0900 From: Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino <itojun@iijlab.net> To: Luigi Rizzo <luigi@labinfo.iet.unipi.it> Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/devel/portlint Makefile ports/devel/portlint/scripts Message-ID: <17839.915545615@coconut.itojun.org> In-Reply-To: luigi's message of Tue, 05 Jan 1999 11:37:21 %2B0100. <199901051037.LAA02324@labinfo.iet.unipi.it>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>> Added files: >> devel/portlint/scripts configure >> devel/portlint/src portlint.1 portlint.pl >> Log: >> being tired of maintaining portlint only by myself, I decided to >> put the source code for "portlint" into FreeBSD port tree. The >I think this approach (having sources into the FreeBSD ports tree) >is useful because it lets people share&maintain code more easily; >on the other hand it opens the door to a huge increase in the >size/#ports ration of the ports tree. I did this by suggestion from asami-san. I took the style from ports/benchmark/tcpblast, which has single C source code in ports/benchmark/tcpblast/src. I agree that this approach is not always recommended. >I wonder if it wouldn't be the case to put portlint into the main >source tree since it is a useful tool and a small one. I have no opinion about the location. My only concern is that portlint MUST be kept portable enough to support (Net|Open)BSD bsd.port.mk too. There are (Net|Open)BSD guys using portlint. itojun To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?17839.915545615>