Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2007 16:32:16 -0500 From: Javier Henderson <javier@kjsl.com> To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Cc: Steven Bens <steven@unix-solutions.be> Subject: Re: Serious Bind issue Message-ID: <18F7B6AF-0997-4209-B92E-1E7D4CCDEA19@kjsl.com> In-Reply-To: <45CB964C.8090409@FreeBSD.org> References: <20070208092346.072F513C47E@mx1.freebsd.org> <45CB8C33.7020608@FreeBSD.org> <DFB7F010-D084-45EB-AE11-B6083424EEC6@kjsl.com> <45CB964C.8090409@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Feb 8, 2007, at 4:29 PM, Doug Barton wrote: > Javier Henderson wrote: > >> FWIW, I was running BIND 9.3.2 for a while and in awe at the >> amount of >> memory it would use, and how it would go CPU bound after it hit any >> operating system imposed memory quotas. > > Many people have reported this problem, but no one has been able to > follow up on getting it fixed. > >> I went back to BIND 8.latest, and my problems went away. > > ... but only for the short term. Development has stopped on BIND 8, > and I'm planning to deprecate the BIND 8 ports now that FreeBSD 4.x > has been EOL'ed. BIND 9 is not even the wave of the future, it's now > the present, and if it's not working for you it's incumbent on you to > contact the bind-users@isc.org list and do what you can to help > diagnose this problem, and test the fixes. Sure. What would you like me to do? I can easily set up a test box to mirror my main nameserver, which is authoritative for over 2000 domains, and test away. -jav
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?18F7B6AF-0997-4209-B92E-1E7D4CCDEA19>