Date: Fri, 17 Nov 1995 08:52:20 -0700 (MST) From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org> To: archive@cps.cmich.edu (Mail Archive) Cc: terry@lambert.org, mikhail@klm.com, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Poor NFS performance under FreeBSD Message-ID: <199511171552.IAA05557@phaeton.artisoft.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.951116222653.7321A-100000@cps201> from "Mail Archive" at Nov 16, 95 10:27:50 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > The lockd/stad have to do with file locking andwon't affect write > > performance at all (unless you use an unlock as a trigger for client > > cache flushing, and even then your processes would have to know > > about it and cooperate). > > Anyone know the status of lockd/statd :) I would really like to scrap > Solaris x86 for FreeBSD file serving but until I have statd/lockd I am > stuck :( Andrew has a fully functional rpc.statd. Since only he and I have kernels with my Sun-style hostid/proxy fcntl changes integrated, the rpc.lockd is pretty much stubbed. He has promised to send the code he does have to me this weekend. I've been hacking locking code at work and my employer doesn't object, so I'm going to be hacking on the rpc.lockd code to turn the stubs into real calls as time and stub availability permits. Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199511171552.IAA05557>