Date: Wed, 28 Feb 1996 22:40:58 +0200 From: Petri Helenius <pete@sms.fi> To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com> Cc: Mark Tinguely <tinguely@plains.nodak.edu>, multimedia@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Seeking advice on mrouted configuration.. Message-ID: <199602282040.WAA10252@silver.sms.fi> In-Reply-To: <2917.825535313@time.cdrom.com> References: <199602281653.KAA13471@plains.nodak.edu> <2917.825535313@time.cdrom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Jordan K. Hubbard writes: > > if mrouted thinks the ed0 and sl0 are on the same network because > > of overlaping netmasks, it will not forward to sl0. > > Any chance of perhaps adding an option to *force* it to do so anyway? :-) > Actually, if mrouted would be really VLSM in that sense, it would consider the destination address of the p2p interface as having a mask of /32 and would be a happy camper. I would ask Bill about what's going to break if you 'fix' that :-) More elegant way would of course to fix your ip-addressing :-) It shouldn't hurt too much to dedicate a subnet of /30 to your sl0-pair. Pete
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199602282040.WAA10252>