Date: Mon, 3 Feb 1997 18:44:50 +1030 (CST) From: Michael Smith <msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au> To: suttonj@interconnect.com.au (Joel Sutton) Cc: jlemon@americantv.com, emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: doscmd vs ??? Message-ID: <199702030814.SAA04986@genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au> In-Reply-To: <199702030427.PAA05241@solsbury-hill.home> from Joel Sutton at "Feb 3, 97 03:27:35 pm"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Joel Sutton stands accused of saying: > > I had a play with doscmd and it seemed to run various things that > pcemu wouldn't. But it works both ways. The speed is quite superior > of course. The latest pcemu (still crawling towards a 'real' 2.0 release) is actually quite a bit better than the old 1.0 in the ports collection. > Would there be much difficulty is getting a set of kernel patches for > us release users (2.1.6) ?? I guess was I'm asking is - Does the new > vm86 kernel code rely on facilities in current? Sean was working on a 2.1.6 system, so I would think that you wouldn't have too much trouble fitting his patches to your kernel. Just be aware that they _don't_ work properly, and unexpected things can wedge your system tight. > Joel... -- ]] Mike Smith, Software Engineer msmith@gsoft.com.au [[ ]] Genesis Software genesis@gsoft.com.au [[ ]] High-speed data acquisition and (GSM mobile) 0411-222-496 [[ ]] realtime instrument control. (ph) +61-8-8267-3493 [[ ]] Unix hardware collector. "Where are your PEZ?" The Tick [[
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199702030814.SAA04986>