Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 10 Mar 1997 15:55:25 -0700 (MST)
From:      Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>
To:        jkh@time.cdrom.com (Jordan K. Hubbard)
Cc:        terry@lambert.org, current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: 2 questions about C++ support in 2.2
Message-ID:  <199703102255.PAA23847@phaeton.artisoft.com>
In-Reply-To: <7322.858034012@time.cdrom.com> from "Jordan K. Hubbard" at Mar 10, 97 02:46:52 pm

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Either that or Terry, like me, thought that "demange" was actually a
> far more descriptive metaphor for c++ symbol munging.  If ever
> there was a language with a serious case of the mange, it's C++.

This is the interpretation I had... it's not the language, though,
it's the linker technology.  THere's no reason to go into the
symbol name space to do symbol attribution.


					Terry Lambert
					terry@lambert.org
---
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199703102255.PAA23847>