Date: Tue, 28 Oct 1997 23:53:09 -0800 From: John-Mark Gurney <gurney_j@efn.org> To: Satoshi Asami <asami@cs.berkeley.edu> Cc: freebsd-current@freefall.FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: bad system call - world build Message-ID: <19971028235309.25355@hydrogen.nike.efn.org> In-Reply-To: <199710290716.XAA23260@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU>; from Satoshi Asami on Tue, Oct 28, 1997 at 11:16:12PM -0800 References: <1657.878108917@critter.freebsd.dk> <199710290716.XAA23260@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Satoshi Asami scribbled this message on Oct 28: > * Besides, doing a make world on -current sources on a 2.X machine > * falls way short of the goal. All of /etc is still the old stuff. > * > * I think it is time to say: > * > * If you want to get from 2.X to 3.X, you install a 3.X snapshot > > I'm afraid you are *completely* missing the point, Kamp-san. People > want to build -current on a 2.X fileserver so they can install it on a > 3.X client. (Or vice versa.) It was working until the getcwd() > change went in. Peter thought he could fix it. We are now trying to > see why it doesn't work. well.. if any body wants a core from vi, I can get you one... know how anoying it is to acidentally type vi from your "-current build environment session" and have it core dump?? :) how do I get the syscall off it? and I hope your not going to say KTRACE, as I don't have it compiled into my kernel right now... oh... and I'm still turning out worlds on my 2.2.1-R box... (I plan on getting my notebook up to -current with the buildworld that's running now)... I've been tempted to add the following to our src/Makefile: :) rome: @echo "Sorry, but Rome wasn't built in a day." -- John-Mark Gurney Modem/FAX: +1 541 683 6954 Cu Networking Live in Peace, destroy Micro$oft, support free software, run FreeBSD
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19971028235309.25355>