Date: Tue, 13 Jan 1998 02:58:22 +0000 (GMT) From: Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com> To: jonny@coppe.ufrj.br (Joao Carlos Mendes Luis) Cc: nate@mt.sri.com, jb@freebsd1.cimlogic.com.au, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Architecture dependent source Message-ID: <199801130258.TAA18098@usr01.primenet.com> In-Reply-To: <199801122015.SAA17293@gaia.coppe.ufrj.br> from "Joao Carlos Mendes Luis" at Jan 12, 98 06:15:59 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> // Personally, I don't see that '/sys/arch' buys us anything other than > // 'Yet Another directory'. Especially when there is no goal of having > // every architecture under the sun working. > > It has the advantage of isolating architectures from other stuff. > A ls in the arch dir shows all architectures, and nothing else. > > I'm not sure, but think it's mostly cosmetic though. Hypothetically, what happens when you: cd /usr/src/include make install Specifically, /usr/include/sys, /usr/include/machine, /usr/include/ufs. Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199801130258.TAA18098>