Date: Wed, 23 Sep 1998 14:28:36 -0400 From: Drew Baxter <netmonger@genesis.ispace.com> To: <david@sparks.net> Cc: Eugeny Kuzakov <kev@lab321.ru>, Darren Reed <darrenr@reed.wattle.id.au>, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Packet/traffic shapper ? Message-ID: <199809231829.OAA12524@Loki.orland.u91.k12.me.us> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSI.3.96.980923092120.14730F-100000@sparks.net> References: <199809230405.AAA11679@Loki.orland.u91.k12.me.us>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
That answers my question :-).. Since I can get as many IPS as I want for no cost I don't have to use any sort of Ip Masquerading.. Maybe sometime I will dive into playing with NAT for some insight.. Wasn't there a copy of a NATin the 3.0 list of ports? I think I saw one when installing 980804.. At 09:22 AM 9/23/98 -0400, david@sparks.net wrote: >On Wed, 23 Sep 1998, Drew Baxter wrote: > >> I was referring to the IPFilter thing namely.. that caught my eye in the >> kernel config script.. >> >> Have you ever thought about using natd or gated? I think you may actually >> find better results. >> >> I can't remeber if gated can do NAT, but I remember I could do it with the >> proxy option in the user-level PPP.. > >gated just implements various routing protocols such as RIP, OSPF, and >BGP. It installs/deletes routes in the kernel based on messages from >other routers. Gated doesn't do any form of NAT. > >--- David Miller > > > >---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > It's *amazing* what one can accomplish when > one doesn't know what one can't do! > --- Drew "Droobie" Baxter Network Admin/Professional Computer Nerd(TM) OneEX: The OneNetwork Exchange 207-942-0275 http://www.droo.orland.me.us To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199809231829.OAA12524>