Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 13 Jun 2000 13:14:59 +0200
From:      Alexander Langer <alex@big.endian.de>
To:        hackers@freebsd.org
Subject:   sigaction.2 manpage: mcontext_t or ucontext_t?
Message-ID:  <20000613131459.C3264@cichlids.cichlids.com>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello!

docs/17863 claims:

The description of the third argument to signal handlers if SA_SIGINFO
is supplied is wrong.  It's a ucontext_t, not an mcontext_t.

It wants to change:
    The context argument to a POSIX SA_SIGINFO handler points to an
-   instance of mcontext_t.
to
    The context argument to a POSIX SA_SIGINFO handler points to an
+   instance of ucontext_t.

I myself think - from reading source - that this is true, but I'm not
quite sure.

I want someone who has clue to verify this :)

Thanks in advance!

Alex
-- 
cat: /home/alex/.sig: No such file or directory


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000613131459.C3264>