Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2000 13:20:55 +0200 From: Volker Stolz <stolz@I2.Informatik.RWTH-Aachen.DE> To: Peter Stapley <pstapley@rapidnet.com> Cc: Volker Stolz <stolz@I2.Informatik.RWTH-Aachen.DE>, questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: SMP Problems Message-ID: <20000910132055.B6131@agamemnon.informatik.rwth-aachen.de> In-Reply-To: <001601c01a97$3fc2f8a0$aa0b22d0@ihatejim.net>; from pstapley@rapidnet.com on Sat, Sep 09, 2000 at 01:50:46PM -0600 References: <200009091901.NAA68271@rapidnet.com> <20000909210324.A3912@agamemnon.informatik.rwth-aachen.de> <001601c01a97$3fc2f8a0$aa0b22d0@ihatejim.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Sep 09, 2000 at 01:50:46PM -0600, Peter Stapley wrote: > SMP: AP CPU #1 Launched! > > Isn't this bad? Should I see two CPU's launched? [This time sent to the list, too] No, note that CPU #0 has been running in the first place. Invoke some processes and use "top" to see processes getting scheduled to different CPUs. -- Volker Stolz * stolz@i2.informatik.rwth-aachen.de * PGP + S/MIME To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000910132055.B6131>