Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 21:07:40 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org> To: Peter Pentchev <roam@orbitel.bg> Cc: arch@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: add -I ignoremask option to du(1) Message-ID: <20001213210739.A87300@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <20001214034803.C575@ringworld.oblivion.bg>; from roam@orbitel.bg on Thu, Dec 14, 2000 at 03:48:04AM %2B0200 References: <20001214034803.C575@ringworld.oblivion.bg>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Dec 14, 2000 at 03:48:04AM +0200, Peter Pentchev wrote: > Comments? Flames? "Shut-up-already"'s? :) ... > +.Op Fl I Ar mask I only ask, if you've researched this to find the prior art of which option letter is most "compatible" for some definition of the word. Pax(1) would use "-X" for this, and diff(1) both "-x" and "-X". To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20001213210739.A87300>