Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2001 08:44:15 -0800 From: Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group <Cy.Schubert@uumail.gov.bc.ca> To: "Jacques A. Vidrine" <n@nectar.com> Cc: Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group <Cy.Schubert@uumail.gov.bc.ca>, Mark Murray <mark@grondar.za>, Matt Dillon <dillon@earth.backplane.com>, arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Wish List (was: Re: The /usr/bin/games bikeshed again) Message-ID: <200102161644.f1GGiJR29010@cwsys.cwsent.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 16 Feb 2001 10:26:18 CST." <20010216102618.A90210@hamlet.nectar.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <20010216102618.A90210@hamlet.nectar.com>, "Jacques A. Vidrine" writ es: > On Fri, Feb 16, 2001 at 06:30:27AM -0800, Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Gro > up wrote: > > Other candidates, Kerveros IV. Anyone is serious about using Kerberos > > would install the krb5 port. (I don't consider heimdal a serious > > condender, it's already a port and it should have stayed there). IMO, > > both Kerberos IV and heimdal are just a waste of disk space). > > Perhaps you'd like to elaborate on your comments about Heimdal. > There is a lot to like about it over the MIT Kerberos implementation, > not the least of which is the fact that the MIT Kerberos license still > does not allow export from US. I understand it to be not a full implementation of Kerberos V. There was some discussion about this on -stable or -security some time ago. As you're the maintainer of both in the FreeBSD ports/source trees you would know more about that than I do. Maybe I'm off base here. -- Regards, Phone: (250)387-8437 Cy Schubert Fax: (250)387-5766 Team Leader, Sun/Alpha Team Internet: Cy.Schubert@osg.gov.bc.ca Open Systems Group, ITSD, ISTA Province of BC "COBOL IS A WASTE OF CARDS." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200102161644.f1GGiJR29010>