Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 16 Mar 2001 14:25:28 -0800
From:      Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
To:        Chris Dillon <cdillon@wolves.k12.mo.us>
Cc:        Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net>, Jim Mock <mij@osdn.com>, Steve O'Hara-Smith <steveo@eircom.net>, arch@FreeBSD.ORG, j mckitrick <jcm@FreeBSD-uk.eu.org>, jkh@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: More BETA evilness Re: BETA induced nervousness
Message-ID:  <20010316142527.B1278@mollari.cthul.hu>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.32.0103161601220.26609-100000@mail.wolves.k12.mo.us>; from cdillon@wolves.k12.mo.us on Fri, Mar 16, 2001 at 04:08:41PM -0600
References:  <20010316134113.I29888@fw.wintelcom.net> <Pine.BSF.4.32.0103161601220.26609-100000@mail.wolves.k12.mo.us>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--wq9mPyueHGvFACwf
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, Mar 16, 2001 at 04:08:41PM -0600, Chris Dillon wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Mar 2001, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
>=20
> > (moved to -arch because...)
> >
> > FYI I'm fighting this cause on the -arch list, I've just quoted
> > this message and added cc's to the people who have the authority
> > to fix it.
> >
> > I want to be clear that it's not just me that's irritated by this.
> >
> > My current solution is instead of -BETA have -STABLE-RC, the
> > '-RC' is there to give knowledgeable people a heads-up and
> > the '-STABLE' is prominent enough to reduce the amount of
> > concern.
>=20
> That would probably lead to some amount of confusion as well, since
> the combination of "4.3" and "STABLE"  anywhere would seem to indicate
> a post-4.3-RELEASE state (hence 4.3-STABLE), while we are actually
> talking about a pre-release state.  If it were 4.2-STABLE-RC, that
> would make sense, but then you don't have the version number bump that
> is needed to test ports, as was pointed out.  Maybe "4.3-ALMOST-THERE"
> or "4.3-NOT-QUITE"? :-)

4.3-PRERELEASE.  Explains exactly what it is, and does so without the
negative connotations of -BETA.

Kris

--wq9mPyueHGvFACwf
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (FreeBSD)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE6spLXWry0BWjoQKURAv+lAJ0a79gQ1cSwAtjGy5xmahcZ5WVi4QCcD/+O
9khIJnJ6mU4T5ZJkDWef9XM=
=x3hO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--wq9mPyueHGvFACwf--

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010316142527.B1278>