Date: Tue, 8 May 2001 11:14:03 -0500 From: "Victor R. Cardona" <vcardona@home.com> To: Juha Saarinen <juha@saarinen.org> Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: CFLAGS Optimization Message-ID: <20010508111403.A8425@marx.marvic.chum> In-Reply-To: <KPECIILENDDLPCNIMLOFCENPCDAA.juha@saarinen.org>; from juha@saarinen.org on Tue, May 08, 2001 at 10:23:41PM %2B1200 References: <E14x41e-0003PI-00@dilbert.fcg.co.uk> <KPECIILENDDLPCNIMLOFCENPCDAA.juha@saarinen.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, May 08, 2001 at 10:23:41PM +1200, Juha Saarinen wrote: > :: I suspect people dont know the difference between gcc and pgcc > :: (which ends up > :: being called 'gcc' on Linux I believe). pgcc does have optimisations up > :: to O6 - > :: > :: http://www.goof.com/pcg/pgcc-faq.html#opts > > No, -O9 is a valid optflag, from 2.95.2 from what I can tell. Anything > -O3 has been broken for ages. The options exist, but they don't do anything. Also, -O3 is rarely used because it is known to produce bad code. If you really want to know more about GCC then I suggest that you hang out on some of their forums. Unfortunately, this is not the place for this discussion. - v -- Victor R. Cardona vcardona@home.com "Behold the keyboard of Kahless, the greatest Klingon code warrior that ever lived!" To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010508111403.A8425>