Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2002 05:20:17 -0800 (PST) From: Hiten Pandya <hitmaster2k@yahoo.com> To: Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com>, Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com> Cc: Chris Mason <mason@suse.com>, Josh MacDonald <jmacd@CS.Berkeley.EDU>, Parity Error <bootup@mail.ru>, freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG, reiserfs-dev@namesys.com Subject: Re: [reiserfs-dev] Re: metadata update durability ordering/soft updates Message-ID: <20020317132017.12789.qmail@web21102.mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <3C948B98.2080703@namesys.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> We would charge for any FreeBSD port, and the license would be a > limiting (proprietary or GPL) license. There are probably appliance > vendors and the like who would find this of interest. OK, I understand there is some big issue going on, but could I possibly know why there would be a charge to port ReiserFS to FreeBSD? As I have my public rights, I think it would be much better if it was ported under a limiting license, such as the LGPL, so ReiserFS can be used as the Boot FS for FreeBSD. IBM, being a being company, has release their JFS under a GPL license, which permits us to port it to FreeBSD, wouldn't it better if ReiserFS just took it one step ahead by making it LGPL? -- Hiten __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Sports - live college hoops coverage http://sports.yahoo.com/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-fs" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020317132017.12789.qmail>