Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2002 09:05:12 -0600 From: "Jacques A. Vidrine" <nectar@FreeBSD.ORG> To: David Pick <d.m.pick@qmul.ac.uk> Cc: Brett Glass <brett@lariat.org>, security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Is FreeBSD susceptible to this vulnerability? Message-ID: <20020328150512.GC1421@madman.nectar.cc> In-Reply-To: <E16qbLv-0004xx-00@xi.css.qmw.ac.uk> References: <4.3.2.7.2.20020328072932.03228b20@nospam.lariat.org> <E16qbLv-0004xx-00@xi.css.qmw.ac.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 02:58:11PM +0000, David Pick wrote: > The FreeBSD default configuratin *is* vulnerable Did I miss something? I do not believe it is. xdm is not run by default, and the default configuration file disallows remote connections even if it is. Cheers, -- Jacques A. Vidrine <n@nectar.cc> http://www.nectar.cc/ NTT/Verio SME . FreeBSD UNIX . Heimdal Kerberos jvidrine@verio.net . nectar@FreeBSD.org . nectar@kth.se To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020328150512.GC1421>