Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2002 23:53:26 -0700 From: Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@icir.org> To: cmxu <cmxu@rdsk.net> Cc: Gabriel Rocha <gabe@seul.org>, freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ipfw on gigabit ethernet Message-ID: <20020822235326.A75186@iguana.icir.org> In-Reply-To: <LDEGKPBNKJEHKIAGKIIMIEHDCDAA.cmxu@rdsk.net>; from cmxu@rdsk.net on Fri, Aug 23, 2002 at 02:36:27PM %2B0800 References: <20020822033536.A66166@iguana.icir.org> <LDEGKPBNKJEHKIAGKIIMIEHDCDAA.cmxu@rdsk.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Aug 23, 2002 at 02:36:27PM +0800, cmxu wrote: > Hello Luigi: > How about make em polling to gain more throughput? it's ready to commit. luigi > cmxu > > >with "em" cards and a 1GHz P3 and ipfw2 and recent fixes (m_getcl()) > >i had a throughput of ~260kpps with a single accept rule, of > >course degrading as the ruleset size increases (i think around 230kpps > >with 10 rules but i could be mistaken). > >The CPU is a bottleneck there, though i do not know how > >fast CPUs you can get on systems with 64-bit PCI slots. > > >I had good experience with the "em" cards and driver. > > > cheers > > luigi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020822235326.A75186>