Date: Sun, 8 Dec 2002 01:08:48 -0800 (PST) From: Josh Brooks <user@mail.econolodgetulsa.com> To: "Scott A. Moberly" <smoberly@karamazov.org> Cc: questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: port redirect with ipfw NOT NAT (not NAT) Message-ID: <20021208010714.J77087-100000@mail.econolodgetulsa.com> In-Reply-To: <43498.65.221.169.187.1038347709.squirrel@mail.karamazov.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Have you tried something like: > > add 01000 fwd 10.10.10.10,5050 tcp from any to 10.10.10.10 50 When I do this, I get: ipfw: getsockopt(IP_FW_ADD): Invalid argumentipfw: getsockopt(IP_FW_ADD): Invalid argument Any ideas ? Is there any reason why port forwarding with ipfw is special and annoying ? Or is there really something qualitatively different about this action that warrants this behavior ? thanks! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021208010714.J77087-100000>