Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2003 00:25:17 +0000 From: "Timothy R. Simmons" <tsimmons77@comcast.net> To: Joel Rees <joel@alpsgiken.gr.jp>, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FreeBSD logo... Message-ID: <200304160025.17674.tsimmons77@comcast.net> In-Reply-To: <20030416120449.A477.JOEL@alpsgiken.gr.jp> References: <47079.207.200.3.5.1050420464.squirrel@otter.centtech.com> <200304150930.02216.tsimmons77@comcast.net> <20030416120449.A477.JOEL@alpsgiken.gr.jp>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
You have my agreement on all three points. On Wednesday 16 April 2003 03:17 am, Joel Rees wrote: > > Okay, I'm sorry, I promised myself I wouldn't do this. > > Breaking a promise to yourself is a good way to weaken your moral > foundations. > > > But after thumbing > > through 165 e-mails this morning, most from this discussion group, I got > > a little tired of reading these. So, I figured I'd just throw in my two > > cents. I'm pagan. I'm proud to be pagan. I'm ordained non-denom pagan. On > > behalf of all the heathens out there using FBSD, I'd like to say... we > > like the daemon. Not because of any ocultist reitualistic 'I wanna go > > sacrifice a goat' BS, but because for once, a major contribution to the > > computing world is using something from our history correctly. Daemons > > were around long before Christianity. > > Many Christians would disagree with that. > > > They weren't bad then, they aren't bad now. Just my two cents. > > No argument with that. Wouldn't really want a "demon" (in the sense of > "evil spirit") in my computer, but "daemons" are no problem. > > Shoot, MSWindows has daemons, too. Microsoft just calls them something > else.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200304160025.17674.tsimmons77>