Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2003 20:12:24 -0500 From: Dave Uhring <duhring@charter.net> To: Matthias Buelow <mkb@mukappabeta.de>, Doug Hardie <bc979@lafn.org> Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 5.1 for production systems Message-ID: <200306202012.24199.duhring@charter.net> In-Reply-To: <20030621005047.GB19709@moghedien.mukappabeta.net> References: <20020916211801.GA32190@fuzzilicious.fuzzynerd.com> <0DAFD736-A382-11D7-BA30-000393681B06@lafn.org> <20030621005047.GB19709@moghedien.mukappabeta.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Friday 20 June 2003 07:50 pm, Matthias Buelow wrote: > Doug Hardie writes: > >Some time ago there was an announcement that people should not use > > 5.0 for critical production systems. Now that 5.1 is available, > > what is the consesous on it? Should it be used for critical > > production systems yet? > > If you can get it to boot... 5.x seems to be a bit picky about > what machines it can be booted on. For example, on our HP Netserver > LH Pro, that's a no-go (4.x installed fine, though). I've heard > other reports, especially notebooks, where installing 5.x was still > a bit on the rough edge (or plainly not working.) RELENG_5 does not seem to have been tagged yet. Does that look like it's stable enough yet?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200306202012.24199.duhring>