Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 13:34:01 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Mohacsi Janos <mohacsi@niif.hu> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: question: maintaining patch separately from ports cvs Message-ID: <20040127213401.GA68505@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20040127112304.C48022@mignon.ki.iif.hu> References: <20040127112304.C48022@mignon.ki.iif.hu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--6c2NcOVqGQ03X4Wi Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 11:39:13AM +0100, Mohacsi Janos wrote: > Dear All, > Are there any possible way to maintain a local patch against a > certain port. > Let's consider a following scenario: > - There is port named foo/bar that is maintained and constantly updated by > the certain maintainer of FreeBSD foo/bar port. > - Somebody wants to use the port, but a heavily modified way e.g.: > patched setup in chroot, jail environment, setup with certain > configuration defaults, that is extremely local specific >=20 > How can one achieve such scenario without interfering the FreeBSD port > system and benefiting the regular update of the port? Use cvs to check out and update your ports tree - see the handbook for documentation. Kris --6c2NcOVqGQ03X4Wi Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAFtlIWry0BWjoQKURAgIeAKDPS9Oa3GZuAUTuUp+h/y3QiUx7vwCfd3wO 48N+G0b56sNu44WGWR14RLA= =z1f5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --6c2NcOVqGQ03X4Wi--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040127213401.GA68505>