Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2004 13:09:03 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: NetAdmin <daemon@foxchat.net> Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: The release of 5.3 Message-ID: <20041017200903.GA74571@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <1098042844.30097.8.camel@foxdaemon.com> References: <CE2BFBAA80DD874BB737A4E2C53AA44903B0191B@CG69UBD01> <1098042844.30097.8.camel@foxdaemon.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--J2SCkAp4GZ/dPZZf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Oct 17, 2004 at 03:54:04PM -0400, NetAdmin wrote: > Saw the mention of "em nics" and wanted to double check for my own > piece of mind... I have a Supermicro SuperServer 5013G-I P4 3.06GHz 1U > with Dual Intel 82540EM Gigabit Ethernet that I'm waiting to put 5.3 > Release on. =20 > http://www.freebsd.org/releases/5.2R/hardware-i386.html#ETHERNET shows - > Gigabit Ethernet NICs based on the Intel 82542 and 82543 controller > chips (gx(4) and em(4) drivers), plus NICs supported by the Intel > 82540EM, 82544, 82545EM, and 82546EB controller chips (em(4) driver > only) > Can I safely presume (without getting flamed) that my nic's will be > supported? If they work in 4.x, they'll work in 5.x. Kris --J2SCkAp4GZ/dPZZf Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBctFfWry0BWjoQKURAt4fAJ4h7ZZThnv6fzfP+YYtg0V/EZvuSQCeOxfP fUACv/qcOK64vXnKBpUHme0= =Kleo -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --J2SCkAp4GZ/dPZZf--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041017200903.GA74571>