Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 19:42:25 -0300 From: AT Matik <asstec@matik.com.br> To: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Load-balancing Message-ID: <200604121942.25737.asstec@matik.com.br> In-Reply-To: <443D7B71.5070004@freebsdbrasil.com.br> References: <20060411092932.42148fd8@giboia> <20060412214619.GT9364@elvis.mu.org> <443D7B71.5070004@freebsdbrasil.com.br>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wednesday 12 April 2006 19:13, Patrick Tracanelli wrote: > > Also, what about some sort of algorith more similar to "plr" for "prob" > action? As my understanding prob is really a probability, which does not > mean say 33% of the packets will match (while plr says it will match - > and drop the packet), it means 33% of probability, right? This would be > different of 33% of matching rate. Lets think of a "rate" option for > "matching rate", a > "probably" not a good choice to generate packet-loss when trying kind of lo= ad=20 balance prob generates random rate (fwd in this case) plr generates random packet _loss_ rate=20 I think the latter option create artificial kind of bw limit Jo=E3o A mensagem foi scaneada pelo sistema de e-mail e pode ser considerada segura. Service fornecido pelo Datacenter Matik https://datacenter.matik.com.br
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200604121942.25737.asstec>