Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 17:03:27 +0100 (BST) From: Jan Grant <jan.grant@bristol.ac.uk> To: Josh Paetzel <josh@tcbug.org> Cc: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Party Message-ID: <20060928170034.E38866@tribble.ilrt.bris.ac.uk> In-Reply-To: <200609280821.41963.josh@tcbug.org> References: <20060920104047.GA49442@splork.wirewater.yow> <5dc6f198bfa0075cef0c190d90351273@FreeBSD.org> <200609271926.14172.soralx@cydem.org> <200609280821.41963.josh@tcbug.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 28 Sep 2006, Josh Paetzel wrote: > The only viable solution to the problem of spam that I can see (and > I'm positive that it would never happen) is an international agency > tasked to track down and punish the people responsible for spam. > They'd have to have the power to go after these people no matter what > country they were hiding in, the resources to make a dent in the > problem, and the cooperation of a significant percentage of mail > admins on the net. Steven Seagal is... SPAMCOP. > Perhaps a slightly more likely scenario would be to make it a crime to > run an open relay? I'd also like to see ISPs take measures to > protect the net from trojaned windows machines on high-speed DSL and > cable connections....perhaps allowing access only to their > mailservers? Wrongly imprisoned for running a relay he never installed. Now he's back. And he wants revenge. > Anyways, enough pipe dreams, I have to get back to reading my logs. Say EHLO to vengeance! etc. -- jan grant, ISYS, University of Bristol. http://www.bris.ac.uk/ Tel +44 (0)117 3317661 http://ioctl.org/jan/ OORDBMSs make me feel old; I remember when this was all fields.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060928170034.E38866>