Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 14 Dec 2008 23:04:25 -0800
From:      prad <prad@towardsfreedom.com>
To:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Why FreeBSD not popular on hardware vendors
Message-ID:  <20081214230425.68dfd5e7@gom.home>
In-Reply-To: <20081215061228.GE5527@kokopelli.hydra>
References:  <4942B6A3.504@gmail.com> <18754.48923.616173.319215@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <20081212205614.GB37185@kokopelli.hydra> <31371229120906@webmail12.yandex.ru> <87iqppdlzh.fsf@kobe.laptop> <20081213002037.F5665@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <20081213092104.GC39031@kokopelli.hydra> <20081213103054.B8893@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <20081213194302.GA51063@kokopelli.hydra> <20081213122621.001352ad@gom.home> <20081215061228.GE5527@kokopelli.hydra>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 14 Dec 2008 23:12:28 -0700
Chad Perrin <perrin@apotheon.com> wrote:

> I think that can be handled quite easily by community social pressure,
> and moderation would just set a precedent for "it's someone else's
> job".
>
i don't think that has to happen at all.

personally i think self-moderation is best, followed by moderation
(which i haven't found to be a bad thing).

here the former seems to be dominant because of the quality of people
on the list, so it is quite sufficient.

-- 
In friendship,
prad

                                      ... with you on your journey
Towards Freedom
http://www.towardsfreedom.com (website)
Information, Inspiration, Imagination - truly a site for soaring I's



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20081214230425.68dfd5e7>