Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 10:19:10 +0100 From: Gerrit =?ISO-8859-1?Q?K=FChn?= <gerrit@pmp.uni-hannover.de> To: pyunyh@gmail.com Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: fun with if_re Message-ID: <20090213101910.a126c14d.gerrit@pmp.uni-hannover.de> In-Reply-To: <20090205082804.GD77461@michelle.cdnetworks.co.kr> References: <20090204100507.5f223d9e.gerrit@pmp.uni-hannover.de> <20090204104655.GA73543@michelle.cdnetworks.co.kr> <20090205085812.b2deb1f7.gerrit@pmp.uni-hannover.de> <20090205082804.GD77461@michelle.cdnetworks.co.kr>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 5 Feb 2009 17:28:04 +0900 Pyun YongHyeon <pyunyh@gmail.com> wrote about Re: fun with if_re: PY> > I did build new nanobsd images with these patches meanwhile and will PY> > start using them today. However, as it has worked without problems PY> > for weeks with the buggy version before, I will not be able to say PY> > if it is really working until next month or so. Or do you know any PY> > method to reliably PY> PY> That's fine. I had to reboot some of the machines meanwhile and could do some further testing. One strange thing I noticed is that the re-interfaces often do not come up in a working state after rebooting. Strangely, I see network traffic floating around via tcpdump, but not even ping works. This state often goes away when playing around with the interface (sometimes ifconfig down/up helps, sometimes disabling some of the additional features like txc/rxc), but I cannot make out a reproducible behaviour so far. When the interface leaves this strange state it seems to work fine afterwards. Any clues? cu Gerrit
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090213101910.a126c14d.gerrit>