Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2010 20:48:30 +0300 From: Jaakko Heinonen <jh@FreeBSD.org> To: Alexander Motin <mav@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Marius =?utf-8?Q?N=C3=BCnnerich?= <marius@nuenneri.ch>, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>, freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Hyperactive g_event thread Message-ID: <20101024174830.GA2555@a91-153-123-205.elisa-laajakaista.fi> In-Reply-To: <4CC46EC7.2090703@FreeBSD.org> References: <4C4ED619.7050305@FreeBSD.org> <27237.1280241532@critter.freebsd.dk> <AANLkTi=uRPV2T0=t_1s=Jc4PmBtai=__HqhCtYpiDdTQ@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTikvV4oymBBA%2B_0zbzd_edS8dRfqqJRODE0989%2Bn@mail.gmail.com> <4C4F171C.9010106@FreeBSD.org> <20101021174301.GA1381@a91-153-123-205.elisa-laajakaista.fi> <4CC46EC7.2090703@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2010-10-24, Alexander Motin wrote: > I don't think that moving wakeup() inside the lock is needed. Right, I already changed that: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-geom/2010-October/004450.html (Some people including you got dropped from the Cc list. Sorry for that.) Thank you for looking at the patch. -- Jaakko
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20101024174830.GA2555>