Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2012 13:53:42 -0600 From: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> To: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Chris Rees <utisoft@gmail.com> Subject: Re: with the cvs history? trying to help INDEX builds. Message-ID: <20120121195342.GG4729@lonesome.com> In-Reply-To: <4F196918.4050309@FreeBSD.org> References: <4F177264.3090708@freebsd.org> <4F17DB1C.6080503@infracaninophile.co.uk> <CADLo83-WtVmyGHM=O4FbTNbDy9h=A1t111bP6eYc%2BTL8-RGmuA@mail.gmail.com> <4F193FD5.8070208@infracaninophile.co.uk> <CADLo83-n_C9h-eLSMZ%2B23s_piocyNuTy_VsNxkKK2RZAA_wG-Q@mail.gmail.com> <4F196918.4050309@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 05:16:08AM -0800, Doug Barton wrote: > On 01/20/2012 04:53, Chris Rees wrote: > > Occasionally someone runs an exp- for sparc64 (lol) etc. > > ... which given the overwhelming lack of users for this platform is > almost certainly a waste of resources. When we switch to DougBBSD, you'll get to dictate to people how to spend their time. Until then, once a month or so, the sparc64 and powerpc runs will continue. As a data-point, I'm finding that ports that fail on either one also fail on clang (now that we're able to quickly turn clang -exps.) I would make the argument that the tier-2s can serve as canaries here. mcl
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120121195342.GG4729>