Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2012 06:16:14 -0400 From: Jerry <jerry@seibercom.net> To: FreeBSD <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Is there a way to run FreeBSD ports through port 80? Message-ID: <20120713061614.4fb43bd3@scorpio> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1207131157440.23696@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <CAPj0R5KJ=0yFcQG5azYfCS73oWLAfJhf4NpAz5Oozo4N-vYQyg@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1207121940400.2744@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <CAPj0R5KsUdM6LsrtvDzSVBScO9k-TFoa=D6O6ghsch0Y-iNx%2BQ@mail.gmail.com> <20120712191306.GA24943@neutralgood.org> <4FFF3386.1060109@gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1207131157440.23696@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 13 Jul 2012 11:58:24 +0200 (CEST) Wojciech Puchar articulated: > > We handle a lot of highly sensitive information and that's the need > > for the severe lock-down. Even the web-proxy is restricted to the > > sites accessible meaning that we need to request access if we need > > to go somewhere not governed by that proxy. > this make sense. > > just blocking everything except 80 is pure nonsense. Not if that is specifically what the OP is attempting to accomplish. Whether or not you feel it is nonsense is about as relative to the problem as tits on a bull. -- Jerry ♔ Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. __________________________________________________________________
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120713061614.4fb43bd3>