Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2016 21:44:33 +0100 From: Kurt Jaeger <lists@opsec.eu> To: Carmel <carmel_ny@outlook.com> Cc: FreeBSD Ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: clamav problem Message-ID: <20160320204433.GJ35640@home.opsec.eu> In-Reply-To: <BLU436-SMTP1278456D545EAC8F27A34D7808E0@phx.gbl> References: <D56A4A3D-EEB0-4092-ACF1-8595ADCC2410@FreeBSD.org> <BLU436-SMTP14099ED2D1E48D4B00CFFA6808D0@phx.gbl> <FB142D1F-B9EE-4414-9380-2E6BE32B5984@FreeBSD.org> <BLU436-SMTP9119D2D6C3CB9A0EC9A7E0808D0@phx.gbl> <895F5CC6-9F5D-4A12-A8C3-E004F4157B4A@pozo.com> <BLU436-SMTP169B1685AB004BA7C80548F808E0@phx.gbl> <20160320114402.GH35640@home.opsec.eu> <BLU436-SMTP2C36C4A07B2F59B2956EB808E0@phx.gbl> <20160320154254.GI35640@home.opsec.eu> <BLU436-SMTP1278456D545EAC8F27A34D7808E0@phx.gbl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi! > >Yes. It seems clamav bugzilla is restrictive and I can not change > >that, as submitter of that bug. > > Now that makes about "ZERO" sense. Why would you (meaning clamav) want > to hide bug information? Dumbest thing I ever saw (almost). There are several instances of ticket systems, where security relevant problem reports are kept restricted. Cisco does it, redhat does it, so... -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 4 years to go !
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20160320204433.GJ35640>