Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 25 Apr 2019 15:01:42 +0200
From:      Emmanuel Vadot <manu@bidouilliste.com>
To:        Daniel Braniss <danny@cs.huji.ac.il>
Cc:        "freebsd-arm@freebsd.org" <arm@freebsd.org>, Ian Lepore <ian@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: i2c almost working for me, was Re: i2c still not working for me
Message-ID:  <20190425150142.bab9fb212c6c7704fdf950d8@bidouilliste.com>
In-Reply-To: <D154835B-8728-4062-89DE-E8DACA7B07F9@cs.huji.ac.il>
References:  <12F641C3-9FAA-4A3A-BA18-A7302F3A0F5E@cs.huji.ac.il> <20190409095819.c560dbc156c46e5ca0244e3e@bidouilliste.com> <23A47048-642A-481C-B7BE-B61E55F82955@cs.huji.ac.il> <20190409171604.GA4581@bluezbox.com> <FCA4E00E-455A-46BF-AD78-E20E1E997BFC@cs.huji.ac.il> <6119CE3B-6042-4DDC-82BE-B0C0C7ADA838@cs.huji.ac.il> <5D4799BC-08DF-4F3D-81A4-C2D938F4AF93@cs.huji.ac.il> <20190417222601.c037efe0cb48987c81032bac@bidouilliste.com> <DDDAC739-D68F-4843-BF89-3044ED442F69@cs.huji.ac.il> <64b5598e2c8c7265f89a31b1f191cb1be318788a.camel@freebsd.org> <CD499934-6E4E-4416-9B73-F3B8AB9A916D@cs.huji.ac.il> <20190419100502.5546770a5795c20e3f4fa9db@bidouilliste.com> <0FDE4A01-D79E-4AFE-BA4C-3F39C4360AF8@cs.huji.ac.il> <20190424130211.7a575f57150882eb3dfabc76@bidouilliste.com> <20190424131517.140d6d4839d2435e08b67d43@bidouilliste.com> <7554C2C1-9FC1-4945-AC1B-2EB115A22D4E@cs.huji.ac.il> <D154835B-8728-4062-89DE-E8DACA7B07F9@cs.huji.ac.il>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 25 Apr 2019 10:37:05 +0300
Daniel Braniss <danny@cs.huji.ac.il> wrote:

>=20
>=20
> > On 24 Apr 2019, at 16:06, Daniel Braniss <danny@cs.huji.ac.il> wrote:
> >=20
> >=20
> >=20
> >> On 24 Apr 2019, at 14:15, Emmanuel Vadot <manu@bidouilliste.com> wrote:
> >>=20
> >> On Wed, 24 Apr 2019 13:02:11 +0200
> >> Emmanuel Vadot <manu@bidouilliste.com <mailto:manu@bidouilliste.com>> =
wrote:
> >>=20
> >>> On Fri, 19 Apr 2019 11:35:09 +0300
> >>> Daniel Braniss <danny@cs.huji.ac.il> wrote:
> >>>=20
> >>>>=20
> >>>>=20
> >>>>> On 19 Apr 2019, at 11:05, Emmanuel Vadot <manu@bidouilliste.com> wr=
ote:
> >>>>>=20
> >>>>> On Fri, 19 Apr 2019 10:20:47 +0300
> >>>>> Daniel Braniss <danny@cs.huji.ac.il <mailto:danny@cs.huji.ac.il>> w=
rote:
> >>>>>=20
> >>>>>>=20
> >>>>>>=20
> >>>>>>> On 18 Apr 2019, at 17:19, Ian Lepore <ian@freebsd.org> wrote:
> >>>>>>>=20
> >>>>>>> On Thu, 2019-04-18 at 10:12 +0300, Daniel Braniss wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> On 17 Apr 2019, at 23:26, Emmanuel Vadot <manu@bidouilliste.com>
> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>=20
> >>>>>>>>> On Tue, 16 Apr 2019 09:16:02 +0300
> >>>>>>>>> Daniel Braniss <danny@cs.huji.ac.il <mailto:danny@cs.huji.ac.il=
>>
> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>=20
> >>>>>>>>>>=20
> >>>>>>>>>>=20
> >>>>>>>>>>> On 11 Apr 2019, at 09:56, Daniel Braniss <danny@cs.huji.ac.il>
> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>=20
> >>>>>>>>>>> if no device is connected, I2CRDWR hangs,=20
> >>>>>>>>>>> it also happens with i2c(8) -s, only reboot helps.
> >>>>>>>>>>>=20
> >>>>>>>>>>> ichb1: twsi_reset: Using IIC_FASTEST/UNKNOWN mode with speed
> >>>>>>>>>>> param=3D2a
> >>>>>>>>>>> iichb1: TWSI_WRITE: Writing 0 to 18
> >>>>>>>>>>> iichb1: TWSI_WRITE: Writing 2a to 14
> >>>>>>>>>>> iichb1: TWSI_WRITE: Writing 40 to c
> >>>>>>>>>>> iichb1: TWSI_WRITE: Writing c4 to c
> >>>>>>>>>>> iichb1: twsi_transfer: transmitting 2 messages
> >>>>>>>>>>> iichb1: TWSI_READ: read f8 from 10
> >>>>>>>>>>> iichb1: twsi_transfer: status=3Df8
> >>>>>>>>>>> iichb1: twsi_transfer: msg[0] flags: 0
> >>>>>>>>>>> iichb1: twsi_transfer: msg[0] len: 9
> >>>>>>>>>>> iichb1: TWSI_WRITE: Writing e4 to c
> >>=20
> >> So looking at this is seems that the "START condition transmitted"
> >> interrupt is never triggered, I'll see to add some type of timeout
> >> around the pause_sbt.
> >=20
> > GREAT! I was about to send you a Nanopi-neo ?,=20
> > I might just do that if you send me an address.
> >=20
> this patch is not that elegant, but works for me:
> Index: twsi.c
> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
> --- twsi.c	(revision 346538)
> +++ twsi.c	(working copy)
> @@ -458,8 +458,15 @@
> 		if (sc->msg->len =3D=3D 1)
> 			sc->control_val &=3D ~TWSI_CONTROL_ACK;
> 		TWSI_WRITE(sc, sc->reg_control, sc->control_val | TWSI_CONTROL_START);
> -		while (sc->error =3D=3D 0 && sc->transfer !=3D 0) {
> -			pause_sbt("twsi", SBT_1MS * 30, SBT_1MS, 0);
> +		{
> +			 int count =3D 10;
> +			 while (sc->error =3D=3D 0 && sc->transfer !=3D 0) {
> +				  pause_sbt("twsi", SBT_1MS * 30, SBT_1MS, 0);
> +				  if(count-- =3D=3D 0) {
> +					   sc->error =3D EDEADLK;
> +					   break;
> +				  }
> +			 }
> 		}
>=20
> 		debugf(dev, "Done with msg[%d]\n", i);

 I think that pause_sbt returns non-zero if the time has elapsed so
check this will possibly be enough.
 I'm more interested on why the controller didn't triggered an
interrupt.

> > danny
> >=20
> >>=20
> >>>>>>>>>>> and now it?s hung
> >>>>>>>>>>=20
> >>>>>>>>>> [?]
> >>>>>>>>>=20
> >>>>>>>>> I don't see that on my OrangePi One or Pine64-LTS.
> >>>>>>>>=20
> >>>>>>>> well, mine is are Nanopi Neo, maybe it?s a dts issue?
> >>>>>>>> I also have a orangepi-zero but it will take me some time to make
> >>>>>>>> a sdcard
> >>>>>>=20
> >>>>>> I managed to boot my OrangePi Zero, and i2c -s has no issues, does=
 not hang.
> >>>>>> still, with the latest (r346368) my NanoPi Neo hangs when no i2c d=
evice is present,
> >>>>>> so what is the difference? or where can I look?
> >>>>>=20
> >>>>> Are you using the same i2c controller on both ?
> >>>> yes, and have tested with several controllers and nanopies,=20
> >>>>=20
> >>>>> Could you paste somewhere the overlays or dts patches ?
> >>>> cat ./allwinner/dts/12/h3-i2c.dtso
> >>>> /dts-v1/;
> >>>> /plugin/;
> >>>>=20
> >>>> //#include "sun8i-h3-nanopi-neo.dts"
> >>>>=20
> >>>> / {
> >>>> compatible =3D "allwinner,sun8i-h3";
> >>>> };
> >>>>=20
> >>>> &i2c0 {
> >>>>        ##frequency =3D <50000>;
> >>>>        status =3D "okay";
> >>>> };
> >>>>=20
> >>>> &i2c1 {
> >>>>        ##frequency =3D <50000>;
> >>>>        status =3D "okay";
> >>>> };
> >>>>=20
> >>>>=20
> >>>=20
> >>> And you have hang on both i2c0 and i2c1 ?
> >>> Also please note that i2c1 pins aren't routed on this PCB, I don't
> >>> think that this could/should make the i2c controller hangs but ...
> >>>=20
> >>> --=20
> >>> Emmanuel Vadot <manu@bidouilliste.com> <manu@freebsd.org>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> freebsd-arm@freebsd.org <mailto:freebsd-arm@freebsd.org> mailing list
> >>> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arm <https://lists=
.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arm>
> >>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arm-unsubscribe@freebsd.org=
 <mailto:freebsd-arm-unsubscribe@freebsd.org>"
> >>=20
> >>=20
> >> --=20
> >> Emmanuel Vadot <manu@bidouilliste.com <mailto:manu@bidouilliste.com>> =
<manu@freebsd.org <mailto:manu@freebsd.org>>
> >=20
> > _______________________________________________
> > freebsd-arm@freebsd.org mailing list
> > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arm
> > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arm-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"


--=20
Emmanuel Vadot <manu@bidouilliste.com> <manu@freebsd.org>



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20190425150142.bab9fb212c6c7704fdf950d8>