Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2013 08:29:13 -0700 From: Tim Kientzle <kientzle@freebsd.org> To: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> Cc: "freebsd-arm@freebsd.org" <arm@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Adding options to RPI-B Message-ID: <2C57A72F-0CB3-41DF-B0E5-1509348128BD@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <CAJ-Vmoni3HTEsxXPh=7mrqJkZbX%2B6gPyAbaC7_P6F3m-E1H%2Bvg@mail.gmail.com> References: <CALCpEUEV2woA3qmQEGQCR0tZ%2B2fMX0xObw3b4F8_MDh51mODDw@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ-Vmoni3HTEsxXPh=7mrqJkZbX%2B6gPyAbaC7_P6F3m-E1H%2Bvg@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Jul 23, 2013, at 10:17 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote: > .. I'd rather we just make modules support work, and start shipping > stripped down kernels w/ modules. I've used modules; as far as I can tell, they work just fine. The status quo is historical legacy. > We have loader support for arm, right? :) Would someone please commit the change to the RPi kernel config to enable all modules by default? That will let us verify the current status before we start removing things that are currently static. Thanks, Tim
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?2C57A72F-0CB3-41DF-B0E5-1509348128BD>