Date: Fri, 07 Apr 2000 23:08:37 -0600 From: Wes Peters <wes@softweyr.com> To: David Holloway <davidhol@windriver.com> Cc: Ugen Antsilevitch <ugen@xonix.com>, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Is traditional unixes kernel really stable ? Message-ID: <38EEBED5.F2D245D@softweyr.com> References: <200004072315.QAA01455@papermill.wrs.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
David Holloway wrote: > > In message <38EE6AA7.55DEA97D@xonix.com>, Ugen Antsilevitch writes: > > > >Gustavo V G C Rios wrote: > > > >QNX is great and all the power to it. This is FreeBSD and it is unix and BSD > >and as such it is what it is. If it would take a QNX approach then it would > >not be FreeBSD but something rather different. Thats the answer... > > Yeah I wouldn't want to have to retaliate with > shameless plugs of vxWorks. Because that might cause me to go off on a rant about how inappropriate both are for making well-behaved internet servers. Portability my ass. -- "Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?" Wes Peters Softweyr LLC wes@softweyr.com http://softweyr.com/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?38EEBED5.F2D245D>