Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2000 12:59:43 -0700 From: Kent Stewart <kstewart@urx.com> To: "Andresen,Jason R." <jandrese@mitre.org> Cc: "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG" <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: Strange conflict Message-ID: <39A42D2F.19DA3ECB@urx.com> References: <39A42600.9A8A7A85@mitre.org> <39A42A04.84D91736@urx.com> <39A42A61.407170FA@mitre.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"Andresen,Jason R." wrote: > > Kent Stewart wrote: > > > > "Andresen,Jason R." wrote: > > > > > > I have an unusual conflict problem. I have an original model > > > SoundBlaster 16 ISA non-PNP (with jumpers and everything!) and a PCI > > > RealTek 10/100 ethernet card (Yes, I know it's crappy). My problem is > > > the RealTek card seems to be conflicting with the SB16, which is > > > extremely odd because they aren't even on the same bus. My symptoms: > > > Whenever I try to play a sound on the SB16, it simply plays the first > > > half second of the song over and over (BuhBuhBuhBuh....) for the > > > duration of the sound and then stops. Removing the NIC restores > > > normal operation, but of course kills my network connection. > > > > I would lay odds (but not bet any money :)) that the RealTek is > > grabbing the IRQ (5 most likely) that the SB wants. That was an old > > symptom. I don't know how you assign an IRQ to the RealTek. You can > > look at the dmesg and see what the RealTek is using. You could > > probably change the jumper on the SB if you can't fix it. > > The strange thing is the Realtek reports: > > > rl0: <RealTek 8139 10/100BaseTX> port 0xe800-0xe8ff mem > > 0xe6801000-0xe68010ff irq 11 at device 15.0 on pci0 > > rl0: Ethernet address: 00:48:54:85:63:3a > > miibus0: <MII bus> on rl0 > > rlphy0: <RealTek internal media interface> on miibus0 > > rlphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto > > Which makes it look like the card is taking irq 11, not 5. Even more > interesting is that the Soundblaster is the only card that reports > taking irq 5. Is it possible for the device to lie on the dmesg output? I've never seen that happen but that doesn't mean it can't. What about dma and i/o port addresses? The SB usually used something like dma 1,5 and i/o 220 and 330. The only machine I have an old SB in is only setup to run Win2K Server. Kent > > -- > _ _ _ ___ ____ ___ ______________________________________ > / \/ \ | ||_ _|| _ \|___| | Jason Andresen -- jandrese@mitre.org > / /\/\ \ | | | | | |/ /|_|_ | Views expressed may not reflect those > /_/ \_\|_| |_| |_|\_\|___| | of the Mitre Corporation. -- Kent Stewart Richland, WA mailto:kbstew99@hotmail.com http://kstewart.urx.com/kstewart/index.html FreeBSD News http://daily.daemonnews.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?39A42D2F.19DA3ECB>