Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2001 14:47:37 -0500 From: "Dan Langille" <dan@langille.org> To: Michael Lucas <mwlucas@blackhelicopters.org> Cc: Will Andrews <will@physics.purdue.edu>, "Bruce A. Mah" <bmah@FreeBSD.ORG>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq book.sgml Message-ID: <3BF91B89.16262.63DD19B@localhost> In-Reply-To: <20011119144504.A93732@blackhelicopters.org> References: <20011119202032.A4448@freebie.xs4all.nl>; from wkb@freebie.xs4all.nl on Mon, Nov 19, 2001 at 08:20:32PM %2B0100
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 19 Nov 2001 at 14:45, Michael Lucas wrote: > On Mon, Nov 19, 2001 at 08:20:32PM +0100, Wilko Bulte wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 19, 2001 at 08:05:07AM -0500, Will Andrews wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 19, 2001 at 07:54:36AM -0500, Michael Lucas wrote: > > > > Geez, what did I ever do to you guys? > > > [...] > > > > Big Scary Daemons: http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/q/Big_Scary_Daemons > > > > > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr-summary.cgi?originator=Michael+Lucas&closedtoo=on > > > > > > 'nuff said... > > > > My point exactly. > > That's "for", not "to." Big difference there. :-) > > Seriously, I'm a tech writer/support person, not a programmer. I > expect -- nay, *require* -- my work be checked by someone with a clue. > Now, I might be wrong, but it's been my experience that FreeBSD > committers are generally expected to know what they're doing. > > Also, many of those PRs have gone through several iterations before > -doc beat them into acceptable shape. You'll notice that none of the > -doc people who actually read my PRs have suggested this. /me thinks he doth protest too much. -- Dan Langille The FreeBSD Diary - http://freebsddiary.org/ - practical examples To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3BF91B89.16262.63DD19B>